Three-dimensional Orbit and Dynamical Masses of GJ 105 AC
Cayla M. Dedrick, Jason T. Wright, Jason D. Eastman, Cullen H. Blake, Samson A. Johnson, Peter Plavchan, John Asher Johnson, David H. Sliski, Maurice L. Wilson, Robert A. Wittenmyer, Thomas Barclay, Jonathan Horner, Stephen R. Kane, and Sharon X. Wang

TL;DR
This paper presents a precise orbital and mass analysis of the GJ 105 AC binary system, establishing it as a key benchmark for stellar models due to its well-measured, effectively single star properties.
Contribution
The study provides the first full orbital analysis of GJ 105 AC, yielding highly accurate dynamical masses and demonstrating its suitability as a benchmark star for stellar evolution models.
Findings
Dynamical masses of GJ 105 A and C are 0.78 and 0.098 solar masses.
The orbital period is approximately 76 years, with full periapsis coverage achieved.
GJ 105 AC has one of the widest separations among stars with precise mass measurements.
Abstract
The precision of stellar models is higher than the precision at which we are able to measure the masses of most stars, with the notable exception of binaries where we can determine dynamical masses of the component stars. In addition to well-measured stellar properties, the ideal benchmark star is far enough from its companion that its properties are indistinguishable from an otherwise identical single star. Currently, there are a handful of stars with precise (3 %), model-independent mass measurements that are "effectively single" and for which we can obtain clean spectra (i.e. spectra that are not blended with a close companion). In this paper, we introduce GJ 105 AC as the newest members of this exclusive population. We present an updated orbital analysis for the long-period K3+M7 binary GJ 105 AC. We jointly analyze radial velocity (RV) and relative astrometry data, including…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
