Evaluating Explanation Quality in X-IDS Using Feature Alignment Metrics
Mohammed Alquliti, Erisa Karafili, BooJoong Kang

TL;DR
This paper introduces new metrics to evaluate the quality of explanations in explainable intrusion detection systems by measuring their alignment with domain-specific knowledge, enhancing interpretability and trustworthiness.
Contribution
The paper proposes novel feature alignment metrics for X-IDS explanations, addressing the gap in existing evaluation methods that overlook domain relevance.
Findings
Metrics differentiate explanation quality across X-IDSs and attack types.
Proposed metrics reflect how well explanations align with domain knowledge.
Evaluation provides actionable insights for improving X-IDS interpretability.
Abstract
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods have become increasingly important in the context of explainable intrusion detection systems (X-IDSs) for improving the interpretability and trustworthiness of X-IDSs. However, existing evaluation approaches for XAI focus on model-specific properties such as fidelity and simplicity, and neglect whether the explanation content is meaningful or useful within the application domain. In this paper, we introduce new evaluation metrics measuring the quality of explanations from X-IDSs. The metrics aim at quantifying how well explanations are aligned with predefined feature sets that can be identified from domain-specific knowledge bases. Such alignment with these knowledge bases enables explanations to reflect domain knowledge and enables meaningful and actionable insights for security analysts. In our evaluation, we demonstrate the use of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
