Pseudopotentials, an overlooked source and remedy of DFT errors
Kuiyu Ye, Jiale Shen, Haitao Liu, Yuanchang Li, and S. B. Zhang

TL;DR
This paper reveals that pseudopotentials significantly contribute to errors in DFT calculations, and proposes atomic-level adjusted pseudopotentials as a practical correction method that improves accuracy beyond standard approaches.
Contribution
It introduces atomic-level adjusted pseudopotentials that correct DFT errors and demonstrates their effectiveness in accurately predicting semiconductor bandgaps.
Findings
Eliminated erroneous metal predictions for 11 compounds.
Reduced mean relative error from 80% to 20%.
Achieved accuracy surpassing hybrid functionals and GW methods.
Abstract
First-principles calculations rely heavily on pseudopotentials, yet their impact on accuracy is hardly addressed. In this work, we show that most pseudopotentials to date introduce errors, which manifest themselves as errors of atomic energy levels, leading to a deviation from the Hohenberg-Kohn theorem. We consider the atomic-level adjusted pseudopotentials, whose interplay with exchange-correlation functional provides a pragmatic correction that balances accuracy and efficiency. We benchmark our theory with bandgap calculation for 54 semiconductors containing monovalent Cu. The results, compared to those from conventional studies, not only remove all erroneous metal predictions for 11 compounds, but also reduce the mean relative error from 80\% to 20\%. Overall accuracy even exceeds those of standard hybrid functionals and GW methods.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
