Violation of NCQ scaling in hadron elliptic flow in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=3.0-7.7GeV
Xun Zhu, Gao-Chan Yong

TL;DR
This study examines the violation of NCQ scaling in hadron elliptic flow in Au+Au collisions at 3.0-7.7 GeV, revealing that NCQ scaling is not a reliable QGP signature at these energies.
Contribution
It demonstrates that NCQ scaling is absent or incomplete at these energies, challenging its use as a QGP signature in the RHIC fixed-target energy region.
Findings
NCQ scaling absent at 3.0 GeV in SM mode
NCQ scaling largely restored at 3.9 GeV in SM mode
Mass ordering appears at 4.5 GeV, indicating partial thermalization
Abstract
We investigate the number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling of elliptic flow for various hadrons in non-central Au+Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 3.0\text{--}7.7\,\mathrm{GeV}\) using the AMPT model with string melting (SM) and pure hadron cascade (HC) modes. For the SM case, NCQ scaling is absent at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}} =3.0\,\mathrm{GeV}\) but is largely restored by \(\sqrt{s_{NN}} =3.9\,\mathrm{GeV}\). Although quark coalescence occurs at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}} =3.0\,\mathrm{GeV}\), the lack of NCQ scaling is attributed to the insufficient development of quark elliptic flow and the limited production of strange quarks and antiquarks. This finding suggests that NCQ scaling could not be considered a definitive signature of quark-gluon plasma (QGP) formation in the RHIC fixed-target energy region. For the HC case, as expected, no NCQ scaling is observed. However, a mass ordering in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
