Arbitrarily Applicable Same/Opposite Relational Responding with NARS
Robert Johansson, Patrick Hammer, Tony Lofthouse

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that NARS, a computational reasoning system, can learn and generalize arbitrary same/opposite relations from minimal training, mimicking human relational cognition.
Contribution
It extends NARS with acquired relations to enable the emergence of flexible, context-dependent relational responding, including symmetric and combinatorial entailments.
Findings
NARS rapidly internalizes trained relational rules.
NARS demonstrates derived relational generalizations.
Relational responding combines mutual and combinatorial entailments.
Abstract
Same/opposite relational responding, a fundamental aspect of human symbolic cognition, allows the flexible generalization of stimulus relationships based on minimal experience. In this study, we demonstrate the emergence of \textit{arbitrarily applicable} same/opposite relational responding within the Non-Axiomatic Reasoning System (NARS), a computational cognitive architecture designed for adaptive reasoning under uncertainty. Specifically, we extend NARS with an implementation of \textit{acquired relations}, enabling the system to explicitly derive both symmetric (mutual entailment) and novel relational combinations (combinatorial entailment) from minimal explicit training in a contextually controlled matching-to-sample (MTS) procedure. Experimental results show that NARS rapidly internalizes explicitly trained relational rules and robustly demonstrates derived relational…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsChild and Animal Learning Development · Action Observation and Synchronization · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
