Crypto-Economic Analysis of Web3 Funding Programs Using the Grant Maturity Framework

TL;DR

This paper introduces the Grant Maturity Framework (GMF) to evaluate the development stages of Web3 grant programs, applying it to Ethereum L2 programs to assess their structure, governance, and impact.

Contribution

It presents a novel mixed-methods model, the GMF, for systematically assessing the maturity of Web3 grant programs, filling a gap in evaluation methods.

Findings

Arbitrum's LTIPP and Optimism's Mission Rounds are highly mature.

Mantle and Taiko are in early development stages.

The study proposes a Web3 grant management platform to enhance maturity.

Abstract

Web3 grant programs are evolving mechanisms aimed at supporting innovation within the blockchain ecosystem, yet little is known on about their effectiveness. This paper proposes the concept of maturity to fill this gap and introduces the Grant Maturity Framework (GMF), a mixed-methods model for evaluating the maturity of Web3 grant programs. The GMF provides a systematic approach to assessing the structure, governance, and impact of Web3 grants, applied here to four prominent Ethereum layer-two (L2) grant programs: Arbitrum, Optimism, Mantle, and Taiko. By evaluating these programs using the GMF, the study categorizes them into four maturity stages, ranging from experimental to advanced. The findings reveal that Arbitrum's Long-Term Incentive Pilot Program (LTIPP) and Optimism's Mission Rounds show higher maturity, while Mantle and Taiko are still in their early stages. The research concludes by discussing the user-centric development of a Web3 grant management platform aimed at improving the maturity and effectiveness of Web3 grant management processes based on the findings from the GMF. This work contributes to both practical and theoretical knowledge on Web3 grant program evaluation and tooling, providing a valuable resource for Web3 grant operators and stakeholders.