Post-treatment problems: What can we say about the effect of a treatment among sub-groups who (would) respond in some way?
Chad Hazlett, Nina McMurry, Tanvi Shinkre

TL;DR
This paper introduces the TRACE method to estimate treatment effects among subgroups defined by their response to treatment, addressing biases from conditioning on post-treatment variables.
Contribution
It proposes a new causal inference framework that identifies and bounds effects among groups characterized by their potential responses to treatment.
Findings
Demonstrates the approach with three real-world examples.
Provides bounds for the effect among non-reactive groups.
Addresses biases from conditioning on post-treatment variables.
Abstract
Investigators are often interested in how a treatment affects an outcome for units responding to treatment in a certain way. We may wish to know the effect among units that, for example, meaningfully implemented an intervention, passed an attention check, or demonstrated some important mechanistic response. Simply conditioning on the observed value of the post-treatment variable introduces problematic biases. Further, the identification assumptions required of several existing strategies are often indefensible. We propose the Treatment Reactive Average Causal Effect (TRACE), which we define as the total effect of treatment in the group that, if treated, would realize a particular value of the relevant post-treatment variable. By reasoning about the effect among the "non-reactive" group, we can identify and estimate the range of plausible values for the TRACE. We demonstrate the use of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
