Conformal geodesics are not variational in higher dimensions
Boris Kruglikov

TL;DR
This paper proves that conformal geodesics do not derive from a variational principle in dimensions higher than three, contrasting with the three-dimensional case where un-parametrized conformal geodesics are variational.
Contribution
It demonstrates the failure of variationality for conformal geodesics in higher dimensions, extending previous results from three dimensions.
Findings
Variationality holds for un-parametrized conformal geodesics in 3D.
Variationality fails for both parametrized and un-parametrized conformal geodesics in higher dimensions.
Variational principle may determine the physical dimension in geometry and physics.
Abstract
Variationality of the equation of conformal geodesics is an important problem in geometry with applications to general relativity. Recently it was proven that, in three dimensions, this system of equations for un-parametrized curves is the Euler-Lagrange equations of a certain conformally invariant functional, while the parametrized system in three dimensions is not variational. We demonstrate that variationality fails in higher dimensions for both parametrized and un-parametrized conformal geodesics, indicating that variational principle may be the selection principle for the physical dimension.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows · Advanced Differential Geometry Research · Nonlinear Waves and Solitons
