On the regularity of time-delayed embeddings with self-intersections
Adam \'Spiewak

TL;DR
This paper investigates the regularity and injectivity of time-delayed embeddings for dynamical systems, showing under what conditions they are almost surely invertible and can approximate Lyapunov exponents, extending classical embedding theorems.
Contribution
It provides probabilistic conditions ensuring that time-delayed embeddings are injective and locally diffeomorphic for typical observables, with applications to Lyapunov exponent approximation.
Findings
Time-delayed embeddings are injective on a full-measure set when k ≥ dim M and k > Hausdorff dimension of support.
For k > dim M, embeddings are local diffeomorphisms at almost every point.
Lyapunov exponents can be approximated arbitrarily well using time-delayed models for k > dim M.
Abstract
We study regularity of the time-delayed coordinate maps \[\phi_{h,k}(x) = (h(x), h(Tx), \ldots, h(T^{k-1}x))\] for a diffeomorphism of a compact manifold and smooth observables on . Takens' embedding theorem shows that if , then is an embedding for typical . We consider the probabilistic case, where for a given probability measure on one allows self-intersections in the time-delayed embedding to occur along a zero-measure set. We show that if and , then for a typical observable, is injective on a full-measure set with a pointwise Lipschitz inverse. If moreover , then is a local diffeomorphism at almost every point. As an application, we show that if , then the Lyapunov exponents of the original system can be approximated with arbitrary…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Control and Stability of Dynamical Systems · Chaos control and synchronization
