A catalogue of candidate milli-parsec separation massive black hole binaries from long term optical photometric monitoring
Vincent Foustoul, Natalie A. Webb, Rapha\"el Mignon-Risse, Elias Kammoun, Marta Volonteri, Chi An Dong-P\'aez

TL;DR
This study identifies 36 candidate massive black hole binaries with periodic optical variability using long-term survey data, providing a valuable catalogue for understanding black hole mergers and evolution.
Contribution
The paper presents a new catalogue of 36 candidate massive black hole binaries identified through long-term optical monitoring, incorporating rigorous analysis to distinguish true periodicity from red noise.
Findings
36 MBBH candidates with sinusoidal variability identified
Periodicities confirmed with Lomb-Scargle analysis and red noise modeling
A catalogue of 221 weaker candidates for future validation
Abstract
The role of mergers in the evolution of massive black holes is still unclear, and their dynamical evolution, from the formation of pairs to binaries and the final coalescence, carries large physical uncertainties. The identification of the elusive population of close massive binary black holes (MBBHs) is crucial to understand the importance of mergers in the formation and evolution of supermassive black holes. It has been proposed that MBBHs may display periodic optical/ultra-violet variability. Optical surveys provide photometric measurements of a large variety of objects, over decades and searching for periodicities coming from galaxies in their long-term optical/UV lightcurves may help identify new MBBH candidates. Using the Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey (CRTS) and Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) data, we studied the long-term periodicity of variable sources in the centre of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
