Classifying Inconsistency in AHP Pairwise Comparison Matrices Using Machine Learning
Amarnath Bose

TL;DR
This paper introduces a machine learning-based method using triadic preference reversals to assess consistency in AHP pairwise comparison matrices, achieving higher accuracy than traditional methods.
Contribution
It proposes a novel triadic preference reversal approach combined with clustering and classification for more reliable AHP consistency assessment.
Findings
PR method achieves 97% accuracy in detecting inconsistency
Outperforms the traditional CR method with 50% accuracy
Implemented in an accessible R package on CRAN
Abstract
Assessing consistency in Pairwise Comparison Matrices (PCMs) within the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) poses significant challenges when using the traditional Consistency Ratio (CR) method. This study introduces a novel alternative that leverages triadic preference reversals (PR) to provide a more robust and interpretable assessment of consistency. Triadic preference reversals capture inconsistencies between a pair of elements by comparing the direction of preference derived from the global eigenvector with that from a 3x3 submatrix (triad) containing the same pair, highlighting local-global preference conflicts. This method detects a reversal when one eigen ratio exceeds one while another falls below one, signaling inconsistency. We identify two key features: the proportion of preference reversals and the maximum reversal, which mediate the impact of a PCM's order on its…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Clustering Algorithms Research · Data Analysis with R · Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
