A Proton Treatment Planning Method for Combining FLASH and Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy to Enhance Normal Tissue Protection

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel proton therapy planning method that combines FLASH radiation and spatially fractionated radiation therapy to maximize normal tissue protection across different tissue depths.

Contribution

It proposes a new SFRT-FLASH modality integrating proton GRID and minibeam techniques with FLASH, optimizing dose and dose-rate constraints for enhanced tissue sparing.

Findings

Achieved 60-80% FLASH effect coverage in clinical cases.

Maintained high PVDR (~2.5-7) at various depths.

Enhanced normal tissue protection compared to conventional methods.

Abstract

Background: FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH-RT) uses ultra-high dose rates to induce the FLASH effect, enhancing normal tissue sparing. In proton Bragg peak FLASH-RT, this effect is confined to high-dose regions near the target at deep tissue levels. In contrast, Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy (SFRT) creates alternating high- and low-dose regions with high peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDR), sparing tissues at shallow-to-intermediate depths. Purpose: This study investigates a novel proton modality (SFRT-FLASH) that synergizes FLASH-RT and SFRT to enhance normal tissue protection across all depths. Methods: Two SFRT techniques are integrated with FLASH-RT: proton GRID therapy (pGRID) with conventional beam sizes and proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) with submillimeter beams. These are implemented as pGRID-FLASH (SB-FLASH) and minibeam-FLASH (MB-FLASH), respectively. The pGRID technique uses a scissor-beam (SB) method to achieve uniform target coverage. To meet FLASH dose (5 Gy) and dose-rate (40 Gy/s) thresholds, a single-field uniform-dose-per-fraction strategy is used. Dose and dose-rate constraints are jointly optimized, including a CTV1cm structure (a 1 cm ring around the CTV) for each field. Results: Across four clinical cases, MB-FLASH and SB-FLASH plans were benchmarked against conventional (CONV), FLASH-RT (FLASH), pMBRT (MB), and pGRID (SB) plans. SFRT-FLASH achieved high FLASH effect coverage (~60-80% in CTV1cm) while preserving PVDR (~2.5-7) at shallow-to-intermediate depths. Conclusions: We present a proton treatment planning approach that combines the FLASH effect at depth with high PVDR near the surface, enhancing normal tissue protection and advancing proton therapy.