On the Depth of Monotone ReLU Neural Networks and ICNNs
Egor Bakaev, Florestan Brunck, Christoph Hertrich, Daniel Reichman, Amir Yehudayoff

TL;DR
This paper investigates the expressivity of monotone ReLU and input convex neural networks, establishing lower bounds on their depth for computing the maximum function and demonstrating depth separations between these models.
Contribution
It provides new theoretical lower bounds on the depth complexity of ReLU$^+$ and ICNNs for the maximum function, and shows depth separation results between the two models.
Findings
ReLU$^+$ networks cannot approximate MAX$_n$
ICNNs require depth at least n to compute MAX$_n$
Depth-2 ReLU networks cannot be simulated by shallow ICNNs
Abstract
We study two models of ReLU neural networks: monotone networks (ReLU) and input convex neural networks (ICNN). Our focus is on expressivity, mostly in terms of depth, and we prove the following lower bounds. For the maximum function MAX computing the maximum of real numbers, we show that ReLU networks cannot compute MAX, or even approximate it. We prove a sharp lower bound on the ICNN depth complexity of MAX. We also prove depth separations between ReLU networks and ICNNs; for every , there is a depth-2 ReLU network of size that cannot be simulated by a depth- ICNN. The proofs are based on deep connections between neural networks and polyhedral geometry, and also use isoperimetric properties of triangulations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques · Advanced Graph Neural Networks · Neural Networks and Applications
Methods*Communicated@Fast*How Do I Communicate to Expedia? · Focus
