Further Characterisation of Digital Pixel Test Structures Implemented in a 65 nm CMOS Process
Gianluca Aglieri Rinella, Nicole Apadula, Anton Andronic, Matias Antonelli, Mauro Aresti, Roberto Baccomi, Pascal Becht, Stefania Beole, Marcello Borri, Justus Braach, Matthew Daniel Buckland, Eric Buschmann, Paolo Camerini, Francesca Carnesecchi, Leonardo Cecconi

TL;DR
This paper presents a detailed characterization of a 65 nm CMOS digital pixel test structure for future high-energy physics detectors, demonstrating its efficiency, radiation hardness, and low-power operation.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the performance and robustness of 65 nm CMOS MAPS technology under various radiation and operational conditions.
Findings
High detection efficiency confirmed after irradiation
Low fake-hit rate achieved in tests
Sensor maintains performance at low power levels
Abstract
The next generation of MAPS for future tracking detectors will have to meet stringent requirements placed on them. One such detector is the ALICE ITS3 that aims to be very light at 0.07% X/X per layer and have a low power consumption in the active area of 40 mW/cm by implementing wafer-scale MAPS bent into cylindrical half layers. To address these challenging requirements, the ALICE ITS3 project, in conjunction with the CERN EP R&D on monolithic pixel sensors, proposed the Tower Partners Semiconductor Co. 65 nm CMOS process as the starting point for the sensor. After the initial results confirmed the detection efficiency and radiation hardness, the choice of the technology was solidified by demonstrating the feasibility of operating MAPS in low-power consumption regimes, < 50 mW/cm, while maintaining high-quality performance. This was shown through a detailed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
