Trends and Gender Disparities in Grades and Grade Penalties Among Bioscience and Health-Related Major Students Before, During, and After COVID-19 Remote Instruction
Alysa Malespina, Fargol Seifollahi, Chandralekha Singh

TL;DR
This study examines how student grades and gender disparities in bioscience and health-related majors changed across pre, during, and post COVID-19 remote instruction, highlighting persistent gender differences in grade penalties.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of grade anomalies and penalties as measures to analyze gender disparities and performance trends across different instructional periods.
Findings
Grades and penalties improved during remote instruction.
Post-pandemic, grades and penalties deteriorated.
Women experienced larger grade penalties than men across all periods.
Abstract
In this study, we investigate student performance using grades and grade anomalies across periods before, during, and after COVID-19 remote instruction in courses for bioscience and health-related majors. Additionally, we explore gender equity in these courses using these measures. We define grade anomaly as the difference between a student's grade in a course of interest and their overall grade point average (GPA) across all other courses taken up to that point. If a student's grade in a course is lower than their GPA in all other courses, we refer to this as a grade penalty. Students received grade penalties in all courses studied, consisting of twelve courses taken by the majority of bioscience and health-related majors. Overall, we found that both grades and grade penalties improved during remote instruction but deteriorated after remote instruction. Additionally, we find more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
