Lost in OCR Translation? Vision-Based Approaches to Robust Document Retrieval

TL;DR

This paper compares vision-based document retrieval methods with traditional OCR-based pipelines, analyzing their performance, generalization, and efficiency for robust document retrieval in varying document qualities.

Contribution

It provides a systematic comparison between vision-based and OCR-based RAG systems, introducing a semantic answer benchmark and practical insights for system selection.

Findings

Vision-based RAG performs well on fine-tuned documents.

OCR-based RAG generalizes better to unseen documents.

Trade-offs exist between computational efficiency and semantic accuracy.

Abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a popular technique for enhancing the reliability and utility of Large Language Models (LLMs) by grounding responses in external documents. Traditional RAG systems rely on Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to first process scanned documents into text. However, even state-of-the-art OCRs can introduce errors, especially in degraded or complex documents. Recent vision-language approaches, such as ColPali, propose direct visual embedding of documents, eliminating the need for OCR. This study presents a systematic comparison between a vision-based RAG system (ColPali) and more traditional OCR-based pipelines utilizing Llama 3.2 (90B) and Nougat OCR across varying document qualities. Beyond conventional retrieval accuracy metrics, we introduce a semantic answer evaluation benchmark to assess end-to-end question-answering performance. Our findings indicate that while vision-based RAG performs well on documents it has been fine-tuned on, OCR-based RAG is better able to generalize to unseen documents of varying quality. We highlight the key trade-offs between computational efficiency and semantic accuracy, offering practical guidance for RAG practitioners in selecting between OCR-dependent and vision-based document retrieval systems in production environments.