Score-based Self-supervised MRI Denoising
Jiachen Tu, Yaokun Shi, Fan Lam

TL;DR
This paper introduces Corruption2Self, a score-based self-supervised MRI denoising framework that effectively learns from noisy data, preserving fine details and achieving state-of-the-art results without requiring high-quality labels.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel score-based self-supervised MRI denoising method with a generalized denoising score matching loss, noise level reparameterization, and multi-contrast extension, outperforming existing self-supervised approaches.
Findings
Achieves state-of-the-art results among self-supervised MRI denoising methods.
Provides competitive performance compared to supervised methods across various noise levels.
Effectively preserves fine spatial features while reducing noise.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful noninvasive diagnostic imaging tool that provides unparalleled soft tissue contrast and anatomical detail. Noise contamination, especially in accelerated and/or low-field acquisitions, can significantly degrade image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Supervised learning based denoising approaches have achieved impressive performance but require high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) labels, which are often unavailable. Self-supervised learning holds promise to address the label scarcity issue, but existing self-supervised denoising methods tend to oversmooth fine spatial features and often yield inferior performance than supervised methods. We introduce Corruption2Self (C2S), a novel score-based self-supervised framework for MRI denoising. At the core of C2S is a generalized denoising score matching (GDSM) loss, which extends denoising score…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
* Reparameterization of Noise Levels: The proposed reparameterization of noise levels is a noteworthy contribution, offering enhanced training stability and convergence. This allows the model to sample uniformly across the noise range, leading to smoother training curves and better generalization. * Comparison with Self-Supervised and Supervised Methods: The paper includes extensive quantitative comparisons with self-supervised and supervised denoising models, establishing C2S as a strong self-s
* Limited Novelty Beyond Classical Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPM): The use of a score-based approach is similar to DDPM without substantial differentiation. Although the reparameterization is innovative, the rest of the framework closely resembles classical score-based diffusion models, raising concerns about the originality of the overall approach. * Noise Level Estimation Error Not Clearly Specified: While Figure 5 attempts to show robustness to noise level estimation error, t
- The proposed algorithm GADSM has sound math groundings. - Authors did extensive experiments to compare the proposed algorithm to a number of baselines and showed its superior performance. - Authors discussed the application of the algorithm to multi-contrast MRI, which is an overlooked field in MRI denoising.
- This paper's originality seems to be limited. The proposed method Reparametrized GADSM is a straightforward extension to ADSM [1]. In addition, authors failed to point out the challenges when applying self-supervised denoising methods in natural images to MRI images. It seems to be that except for the multi-contrast part, the others are natural extensions of techniques that have already been tested on natural images. - The paper's problem setup is very similar to Noiser2noise [2], both handlin
1. The paper comprehensively analyzes and applies existing self-supervised and supervised denoising approaches in the context of MRI 2. The paper is well written, original and provides great detail into the workflow of the Corruption2Self (C2F) framework. 3. Incorporation to reparametrization (Table 4) and extensions to multi-contrast settings to improve denoising. 4. Showcases robustness of methodology on varied noise level estimations compared to true noise (Table 9)
### A. Detail refinement extension claim According to the metrics in Table 1, it is unclear if the detail refinement extension is being effective. The improvements in PSNR / SSIM does not seem notable. It would be helpful to include an error bar (for the table), statistical significance test (to show notability) and visuals to show effectiveness. ### B. Applicability and impact The paper can cover how their workflow can be used in practice while denoising. The following aspects can add more val
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImage and Signal Denoising Methods · Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
MethodsDenoising Score Matching
