Analysis of the accuracy of GNSS inferred precipitable water vapour against that from a 210 GHz WVR at the H.E.S.S. site
Lott Frans, Michael Backes, Heino Falcke, and Tiziana Venturi

TL;DR
This study compares GNSS-based precipitable water vapour measurements with those from a 210 GHz Water Vapour Radiometer at the H.E.S.S. site, demonstrating high accuracy and reliability for atmospheric assessment in astronomical observations.
Contribution
It provides a validation of GNSS measurements against WVR data for PWV estimation, highlighting the importance of on-site meteorological data for accuracy.
Findings
98% correlation between GNSS and WVR PWV data
Offset of 0.34 mm with standard calculations
Offset reduces to 0.15 mm using on-site meteorological data
Abstract
The High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.) site and the Gamsberg Mountain have been identified as potential sites for the Africa Millimetre Telescope (AMT). The AMT is poised to observe at millimetre and possibly at submillimetre wavelengths. At these wavelengths, precipitable water vapour (PWV) in the atmosphere is the main source of opacity during observations and therefore needs to be accurately assessed at the potential sites for the AMT. In order to investigate the PWV conditions for the AMT, identical Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) stations were installed and used to assess the PWV at the two potential sites. In this study, the accuracy of those PWV measurements by the GNSS stations was assessed by comparing the H.E.S.S. installed GNSS station PWV measurements to that from a 210 GHz Water Vapour Radiometer (WVR) also installed at the H.E.S.S. site. A correlation of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
