p-complete square-free Word-representation of Word-representable Graphs
Biswajit Das, Ramesh Hariharasubramanian

TL;DR
This paper introduces p-complete square-free word-representable graphs, characterizes them for small p, and explores their properties, including recognition complexity and representation bounds.
Contribution
It defines p-complete square-free word-representability, provides characterizations for p=1,2, and shows how these graphs relate to Kp-free circle graphs.
Findings
Recognition is NP-hard for arbitrary p.
Every Kp-free circle graph admits a p-complete square-free uniform representation.
3-complete square-free uniform graphs have representation number at most three.
Abstract
A graph G(V, E) is word-representable if there exists a word w over V such that distinct letters x and y alternate in w iff . We introduce p-complete squares and p-complete square-free word-representable graphs. A word is p-complete square-free if no induced subword over any subset of letters contains a square XX with . A graph is p-complete square-free if it admits such a representation. We define p-complete square-free uniform word-representations and study their properties. We show that any graph admitting such a representation forbids Kp as an induced subgraph and that the recognition problem is NP-hard for arbitrary p. For p=1 and 2, we give complete characterisations. We prove that every -free circle graph admits a p-complete square-free uniform representation and that any 3-complete square-free uniform word-representable graph has representation number…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · semigroups and automata theory · Algorithms and Data Compression
