Final Moments III: Explosion Properties and Progenitor Constraints of CSM-Interacting Type II Supernovae
W. V. Jacobson-Gal\'an, L. Dessart, K. W. Davis, K. A. Bostroem, C. D., Kilpatrick, R. Margutti, A. V. Filippenko, R. J. Foley, R. Chornock, G., Terreran, D. Hiramatsu, M. Newsome, E. Padilla Gonzalez, C. Pellegrino, D. A., Howell, J. P. Anderson, C. R. Angus, K. Auchettl

TL;DR
This study analyzes 39 Type II supernovae with and without early-time IIn-like features, revealing differences in luminosity and decline rates, progenitor masses mostly below 12.5 solar masses, and evidence for significant pre-explosion mass loss.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the properties, progenitor masses, and mass-loss mechanisms of CSM-interacting Type II supernovae, expanding understanding of their explosion environments.
Findings
SN IIn-like features correlate with higher luminosities and faster decline rates.
Most progenitors have masses below 12.5 solar masses.
Evidence of substantial pre-explosion mass loss rates.
Abstract
We present analysis of the plateau and late-time phase properties of a sample of 39 Type II supernovae (SNe II) that show narrow, transient, high-ionization emission lines (i.e., "IIn-like") in their early-time spectra from interaction with confined, dense circumstellar material (CSM). Originally presented by Jacobson-Gal\'an et al 2024a, this sample also includes multicolor light curves and spectra extending to late-time phases of 35 SNe with no evidence for IIn-like features at <2 days after first light. We measure photospheric phase light-curve properties for the distance-corrected sample and find that SNe II with IIn-like features have significantly higher luminosities and decline rates at +50 days than the comparison sample, which could be connected to inflated progenitor radii, lower ejecta mass, and/or persistent CSM interaction. However, we find no statistical evidence that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
