Perpetuating Misogyny with Generative AI: How Model Personalization Normalizes Gendered Harm
Laura Wagner, Eva Cetinic

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how personalization in open-source text-to-image models can perpetuate misogyny and harmful content, highlighting sociotechnical factors and proposing interventions for safer AI practices.
Contribution
It provides an exploratory sociotechnical analysis of CivitAI, revealing how model personalization fosters misogynistic and NSFW content, and suggests strategies for harm mitigation.
Findings
Rise in NSFW content on CivitAI
Prevalence of models mimicking real individuals
Influence of internet subcultures on model practices
Abstract
Open-source text-to-image (TTI) pipelines have become dominant in the landscape of AI-generated visual content, driven by technological advances that enable users to personalize models through adapters tailored to specific tasks. While personalization methods such as LoRA offer unprecedented creative opportunities, they also facilitate harmful practices, including the generation of non-consensual deepfakes and the amplification of misogynistic or hypersexualized content. This study presents an exploratory sociotechnical analysis of CivitAI, the most active platform for sharing and developing open-source TTI models. Drawing on a dataset of more than 40 million user-generated images and over 230,000 models, we find a disproportionate rise in not-safe-for-work (NSFW) content and a significant number of models intended to mimic real individuals. We also observe a strong influence of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Gender, Feminism, and Media
