Do We Still Need to Work on Odometry for Autonomous Driving?
Cedric Le Gentil, Daniil Lisus, Timothy D. Barfoot

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of a simple odometry algorithm using wheel encoder and gyroscope data, showing it can outperform more complex methods in accuracy and efficiency for autonomous driving.
Contribution
It demonstrates that a basic OG odometry algorithm can rival state-of-the-art methods in accuracy while being computationally cheaper, questioning the need for complex odometry research.
Findings
OG odometry outperforms radar-inertial SE(2) methods in accuracy.
OG odometry is computationally much more efficient.
Slippage significantly affects OG odometry accuracy.
Abstract
Over the past decades, a tremendous amount of work has addressed the topic of ego-motion estimation of moving platforms based on various proprioceptive and exteroceptive sensors. At the cost of ever-increasing computational load and sensor complexity, odometry algorithms have reached impressive levels of accuracy with minimal drift in various conditions. In this paper, we question the need for more research on odometry for autonomous driving by assessing the accuracy of one of the simplest algorithms: the direct integration of wheel encoder data and yaw rate measurements from a gyroscope. We denote this algorithm as Odometer-Gyroscope (OG) odometry. This work shows that OG odometry can outperform current state-of-the-art radar-inertial SE(2) odometry for a fraction of the computational cost in most scenarios. For example, the OG odometry is on top of the Boreas leaderboard with a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization · Robotic Locomotion and Control · Inertial Sensor and Navigation
