Risk Sharing Among Many: Implementing a Subgame Perfect and Optimal Equilibrium
Michiko Ogaku

TL;DR
This paper extends a risk-sharing mechanism to infinite feasible allocations, proving it implements welfare-maximizing outcomes even with heterogeneous, finitely additive priors, and pairs it with an auction to ensure fairness and optimality.
Contribution
It generalizes the price-and-choose mechanism to infinite menus and demonstrates its effectiveness with heterogeneous priors, combining it with an auction for fair risk sharing.
Findings
Mechanism implements welfare-maximizing risk sharing.
Extension to infinite menus with heterogeneous priors.
Auction achieves surplus equalization among participants.
Abstract
Can a welfare-maximising risk-sharing rule be implemented in a large, decentralised community? We revisit the price-and-choose (P&C) mechanism of Echenique and N\'u\~nez (2025), in which players post price schedules sequentially and the last mover selects an allocation. P&C implements every Pareto-optimal allocation when the choice set is finite, but realistic risk-sharing problems involve an infinite continuum of feasible allocations. We extend P&C to infinite menus by modelling each allocation as a bounded random vector that redistributes an aggregate loss . We prove that the extended mechanism still implements the allocation that maximises aggregate (monetary) utility, even when players entertain heterogeneous credal sets of finitely additive probabilities (charges) dominated by a reference probability . Our credal sets are weak-compact and are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
