Position: We Need Responsible, Application-Driven (RAD) AI Research
Sarah Hartman, Cheng Soon Ong, Julia Powles, Petra Kuhnert

TL;DR
This paper advocates for a responsible, application-driven AI research approach that emphasizes ethical, societal, and contextual considerations to ensure AI advances are meaningful and beneficial for society.
Contribution
It introduces a three-stage framework for RAD-AI, emphasizing transdisciplinary teams, context-specific methods, and staged testing to align AI research with societal needs.
Findings
Promotes transdisciplinary, people-centered AI research
Highlights importance of context-specific ethical considerations
Proposes staged testing and community engagement for sustainable AI development
Abstract
This position paper argues that achieving meaningful scientific and societal advances with artificial intelligence (AI) requires a responsible, application-driven approach (RAD) to AI research. As AI is increasingly integrated into society, AI researchers must engage with the specific contexts where AI is being applied. This includes being responsive to ethical and legal considerations, technical and societal constraints, and public discourse. We present the case for RAD-AI to drive research through a three-staged approach: (1) building transdisciplinary teams and people-centred studies; (2) addressing context-specific methods, ethical commitments, assumptions, and metrics; and (3) testing and sustaining efficacy through staged testbeds and a community of practice. We present a vision for the future of application-driven AI research to unlock new value through technically feasible…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
