CUI-MET: Clinical Utility Index Dose Optimization Approach for Multiple-Dose, Multiple-Outcome Randomized Trial Designs
Fanni Zhang, Kristine Broglio, Michael Sweeting, Gina D'Angelo

TL;DR
CUI-MET is a flexible, utility-based framework for dose optimization in early-phase oncology trials that integrates multiple endpoints and provides user-friendly tools for decision-making.
Contribution
It introduces a novel, practical approach combining multiple binary endpoints into a single utility index, with implementation in an interactive R Shiny app for improved usability.
Findings
Demonstrated the framework's effectiveness through case examples.
Provided bootstrap confidence intervals for dose selection robustness.
Enabled flexible endpoint weighting reflecting clinical priorities.
Abstract
Dose optimization in oncology clinical trials has shifted from seeking the maximum tolerated dose to identifying the Optimal Biological Dose (OBD) that balances therapeutic benefits and risks across multiple clinical attributes. Existing advanced dose-finding methods can integrate multiple endpoints and compare dose levels but are often complex or computationally intensive, limiting their use in early-phase trials. To address these challenges, we propose the Clinical Utility Index Dose Optimization Approach for Multiple-dose Multiple-Outcome Randomized Trial Designs (CUI-MET). This framework integrates multiple binary endpoints using a clinical utility-based approach, calculating a combined clinical utility index (CUI) for each dose level by weighting endpoint responses. Both empirical and modeling methods can estimate marginal probabilities for each endpoint. These estimated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
