Simulation-based performance comparison of varied pitch sizes GEM detectors

TL;DR

This study uses simulations to compare the performance of GEM detectors with different pitch sizes, aiming to optimize their effectiveness for high-energy physics applications.

Contribution

It introduces a simulation-based framework to evaluate and compare the performance of GEM detectors with varied pitch sizes, including validation against experimental data.

Findings

Reduced pitch size improves effective gain and position resolution.

Simulation results align well with experimental data for standard GEMs.

Optimized electric fields enhance detector performance.

Abstract

Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) detectors, typically featuring a standard pitch size of 140 $\mu$m and an inner hole diameter of 50 $\mu$m, are extensively utilized in high-energy physics experiments for tracking, triggering, and timing measurements. Their characteristics, such as high gain, good position resolution, improved temporal resolution, low discharge probability, radiation hardness, and high rate capabilities, make them highly favoured. Recent experimental studies have shown that triple-GEM detectors with a reduced pitch size of 90 $\mu$m and a smaller hole diameter of 40 $\mu$m can perform better than standard-pitch GEM detectors. To assess the effectiveness of these reduced dimensions, we conducted a simulation-based study using ANSYS and Garfield++. As a first step, we validated the simulation framework by modelling a standard single GEM detector and comparing the results with previous simulations and experimental data. Following validation, we designed GEM structures with reduced pitch sizes of 90 $\mu$m and 60 $\mu$m. We then performed a comparative analysis, focusing on key performance parameters like effective gain, electron transparency, and position resolution. These parameters were varied against an increase in GEM potential, drift electric field, induction electric field, drift gap, induction gap, and gas composition to optimize the performance of the detectors.