Lower Bounds for Greedy Teaching Set Constructions
Spencer Compton, Chirag Pabbaraju, Nikita Zhivotovskiy

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limitations of greedy algorithms in constructing minimal teaching sets for concept classes, establishing lower bounds that suggest more complex methods are needed to achieve optimal bounds related to VC dimension.
Contribution
It provides the first lower bounds for greedy teaching set algorithms for small k, indicating their limitations and guiding future research towards more sophisticated approaches.
Findings
For k=1, greedy algorithms do not outperform halving bounds.
For k=2, the lower bound matches the known upper bound, confirming tightness.
Lower bounds extend up to k proportional to VC dimension, implying complexity in achieving optimal teaching sets.
Abstract
A fundamental open problem in learning theory is to characterize the best-case teaching dimension of a concept class with finite VC dimension . Resolving this problem will, in particular, settle the conjectured upper bound on Recursive Teaching Dimension posed by [Simon and Zilles; COLT 2015]. Prior work used a natural greedy algorithm to construct teaching sets recursively, thereby proving upper bounds on , with the best known bound being [Hu, Wu, Li, and Wang; COLT 2017]. In each iteration, this greedy algorithm chooses to add to the teaching set the labeled points that restrict the concept class the most. In this work, we prove lower bounds on the performance of this greedy approach for small . Specifically, we show that for , the algorithm does not improve upon the halving-based bound of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
