The Proportional Veto Principle for Approval Ballots
Daniel Halpern, Ariel D. Procaccia, Warut Suksompong

TL;DR
This paper introduces the flexible-voter representation (FVR) principle for approval ballots, proposing a scoring rule that guarantees FVR optimality across all thresholds and extending the concept to multi-winner elections.
Contribution
It adapts the proportional veto principle to approval voting and identifies a scoring rule that is FVR-optimal universally, also extending the framework to multi-winner settings.
Findings
Approval voting and scoring rules have limited FVR guarantees at certain thresholds.
A specific scoring rule achieves universal FVR optimality.
Results extend to multi-winner voting scenarios.
Abstract
The proportional veto principle, which captures the idea that a candidate vetoed by a large group of voters should not be chosen, has been studied for ranked ballots in single-winner voting. We introduce a version of this principle for approval ballots, which we call flexible-voter representation (FVR). We show that while the approval voting rule and other natural scoring rules provide the optimal FVR guarantee only for some flexibility threshold, there exists a scoring rule that is FVR-optimal for all thresholds simultaneously. We also extend our results to multi-winner voting.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEuropean and International Contract Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Law, logistics, and international trade
