Computational Identification of Regulatory Statements in EU Legislation
Gijs Jan Brandsma, Jens Blom-Hansen, Christiaan Meijer, Kody Moodley

TL;DR
This paper presents two computational methods, dependency parsing and transformer-based models, for automatically identifying regulatory statements in EU legislation, achieving around 80-84% accuracy and highlighting the potential for combined approaches.
Contribution
It introduces a specific definition of regulatory statements and compares two novel automated identification approaches in EU legal texts.
Findings
Both methods achieved over 80% accuracy.
The approaches showed similar performance levels.
Potential for combining methods to improve results.
Abstract
Identifying regulatory statements in legislation is useful for developing metrics to measure the regulatory density and strictness of legislation. A computational method is valuable for scaling the identification of such statements from a growing body of EU legislation, constituting approximately 180,000 published legal acts between 1952 and 2023. Past work on extraction of these statements varies in the permissiveness of their definitions for what constitutes a regulatory statement. In this work, we provide a specific definition for our purposes based on the institutional grammar tool. We develop and compare two contrasting approaches for automatically identifying such statements in EU legislation, one based on dependency parsing, and the other on a transformer-based machine learning model. We found both approaches performed similarly well with accuracies of 80% and 84% respectively…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
