XAIxArts Manifesto: Explainable AI for the Arts
Nick Bryan-Kinns, Shuoyang Jasper Zheng, Francisco Castro, Makayla, Lewis, Jia-Rey Chang, Gabriel Vigliensoni, Terence Broad, Michael Clemens,, Elizabeth Wilson

TL;DR
This paper introduces the XAIxArts manifesto to promote new, inclusive perspectives on explainable AI in the arts, emphasizing artistic practice, empowerment, and openness beyond traditional technocentric explanations.
Contribution
It presents a participatory, manifesto-based approach to rethinking explainability in AI for the arts, fostering community engagement and critical reflection.
Findings
Engages community through a World Café discussion format.
Proposes four core themes for inclusive AI explainability.
Creates a living, revisable manifesto for the CHI community.
Abstract
Explainable AI (XAI) is concerned with how to make AI models more understandable to people. To date these explanations have predominantly been technocentric - mechanistic or productivity oriented. This paper introduces the Explainable AI for the Arts (XAIxArts) manifesto to provoke new ways of thinking about explainability and AI beyond technocentric discourses. Manifestos offer a means to communicate ideas, amplify unheard voices, and foster reflection on practice. To supports the co-creation and revision of the XAIxArts manifesto we combine a World Caf\'e style discussion format with a living manifesto to question four core themes: 1) Empowerment, Inclusion, and Fairness; 2) Valuing Artistic Practice; 3) Hacking and Glitches; and 4) Openness. Through our interactive living manifesto experience we invite participants to actively engage in shaping this XIAxArts vision within the CHI…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
