TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to improve LLM reasoning by identifying and unlearning spurious beliefs, leading to more accurate and reliable answers without sacrificing overall performance.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel belief rectification technique using unlearning and explanation-based belief identification to enhance LLM reasoning accuracy.
Findings
Corrects misanswered questions effectively
Improves generalization on unseen data
Maintains overall model performance
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) can exhibit advanced reasoning yet still generate incorrect answers. We hypothesize that such errors frequently stem from spurious beliefs, propositions the model internally considers true but are incorrect. To address this, we propose a method to rectify the belief space by suppressing these spurious beliefs while simultaneously enhancing true ones, thereby enabling more reliable inferences. Our approach first identifies the beliefs that lead to incorrect or correct answers by prompting the model to generate textual explanations, using our Forward-Backward Beam Search (FBBS). We then apply unlearning to suppress the identified spurious beliefs and enhance the true ones, effectively rectifying the model's belief space. Empirical results on multiple QA datasets and LLMs show that our method corrects previously misanswered questions without harming overall…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
