Mean-field approximation and phase transitions in an Ising-voter model on directed regular random graphs
Adam Lipowski, Antonio Luis Ferreira, Dorota Lipowska, Aleksandra, Napierala-Batygolska

TL;DR
This paper investigates phase transitions in an Ising-voter model on directed regular random graphs, revealing how different dynamics and agent types influence the model's behavior and its alignment with mean-field predictions.
Contribution
It introduces heterogeneous modifications with voter and antivoter agents, analyzing their effects on phase transitions and the applicability of mean-field approximation.
Findings
Voter agents do not influence the Ising model dynamics.
Antivoter agents act as noise, weakening ferromagnetic order.
Heat-bath dynamics align with mean-field predictions, Metropolis does not.
Abstract
It is known that on directed graphs, the correlations between neighbours of a given site vanish and thus simple mean-field-like arguments can be used to describe exactly the behaviour of Ising-like systems. We analyse heterogeneous modifications of such models where a fraction of agents is driven by the voter or the antivoter dynamics. It turns out that voter agents do not affect the dynamics of the model and it behaves like a pure Ising model. Antivoter agents have a stronger impact since they act as a kind of noise, which weakens a ferromagnetic ordering. Only when Ising spins are driven by the heat-bath dynamics, the behaviour of the model is correctly described by the mean-field approximation. The Metropolis dynamics generates some additional correlations that render the mean-field approach approximate. Simulations on annealed networks agree with the mean-field approximation but for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
