Abstraction Functions as Types

TL;DR

This paper develops a type-theoretic framework for modular verification of software, using abstraction functions encoded as types to ensure correctness and cost analysis while maintaining privacy of implementation details.

Contribution

It introduces a novel type-theoretic encoding of abstraction functions within univalent dependent type theory, enabling modular verification and cost analysis.

Findings

Supports modular verification of program correctness.

Allows cost analysis relative to specifications.

Ensures private details are hidden from clients.

Abstract

Software development depends on the use of libraries whose public specifications inform client code and impose obligations on private implementations; it follows that verification at scale must also be modular, preserving such abstraction. Hoare's influential methodology uses abstraction functions to demonstrate the coherence between such concrete implementations and their abstract specifications. However, the Hoare methodology relies on a conventional separation between implementation and specification, providing no linguistic support for ensuring that this convention is obeyed. This paper proposes a synthetic account of Hoare's methodology within univalent dependent type theory by encoding the data of abstraction functions within types themselves. This is achieved via a phase distinction, which gives rise to a gluing construction that renders an abstraction function as a type and a pair of modalities that fracture a type into its concrete and abstract parts. A noninterference theorem governing the phase distinction characterizes the modularity guarantees provided by the theory. This approach scales to verification of cost, allowing the analysis of client cost relative to a cost-aware specification. A monadic sealing effect facilitates modularity of cost, permitting an implementation to be upper-bounded by its specification in cases where private details influence observable cost. The resulting theory supports modular development of programs and proofs in a manner that hides private details of no concern to clients while permitting precise specifications of both the cost and behavior of programs.