A physically motivated galaxy size definition across different state-of-the-art hydrodynamical simulations
Elena Arjona-Galvez, Salvador Cardona-Barrero, Robert J. J. Grand, Arianna Di Cintio, Claudio Dalla Vecchia, Jose A. Benavides, Andrea V. Maccio, Noam Libeskind, Alexander Knebe

TL;DR
This paper introduces a physically motivated galaxy size definition based on the stellar mass density contour at 1 Msun pc^-2, demonstrating its robustness and consistency across different simulations and redshifts, and its potential as a reliable observational tracer.
Contribution
It proposes and validates a new galaxy size metric using hydrodynamical simulations, showing its consistency and independence from galaxy formation model variations.
Findings
The R_1-M_star relation is consistent across galaxy masses and redshifts.
The size-stellar mass relation has low scatter and is robust across different simulation suites.
R_1 correlates strongly with the galaxy's total mass, indicating its potential as a dynamical mass tracer.
Abstract
Galaxy sizes are a key parameter to distinguishing between different galaxy types and morphologies, reflecting their formation and assembly histories. Several methods define galaxy boundaries, often relying on light concentration or isophotal densities. However, these approaches were often constrained by observational limitations and did not necessarily provide a clear physical boundary for galaxy outskirts. With modern deep imaging surveys, a new physically motivated definition has emerged using the radial position of the star formation threshold as the galaxy size, approximated by the stellar mass density contour at 1 Msun pc^-2 (R_1). We test this definition using three state-of-the-art hydrodynamical simulation suites, analyzing stellar surface density profiles across a wide range of stellar masses and redshifts. We measure the galaxy sizes according to this new definition and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
