Strategic Hiring under Algorithmic Monoculture
Jackie Baek, Hamsa Bastani, Shihan Chen

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how firms' strategic hiring in algorithmic monoculture markets affects efficiency, showing that strategic diversification improves social welfare and nearly achieves optimal efficiency, but requires platforms to share congestion data.
Contribution
It models a game-theoretic framework for strategic hiring under algorithmic monoculture, characterizes Nash equilibria, and highlights the importance of congestion information sharing for welfare gains.
Findings
Equilibrium strategies outperform naive selection in welfare.
Price of Naive Selection grows linearly with number of firms.
Decentralized equilibrium approaches social optimality.
Abstract
We study the impact of strategic behavior in labor markets characterized by algorithmic monoculture, where firms compete for a shared pool of applicants using a common algorithmic evaluation. In this setting, "naive" hiring strategies lead to severe congestion, as firms collectively target the same high-scoring candidates. We model this competition as a game with capacity-constrained firms and fully characterize the set of Nash equilibria. We demonstrate that equilibrium strategies, which naturally diversify firms' interview targets, significantly outperform naive selection, increasing social welfare for both firms and applicants. Specifically, the Price of Naive Selection (welfare gain from strategy) grows linearly with the number of firms, while the Price of Anarchy (efficiency loss from decentralization) approaches 1, implying that the decentralized equilibrium is nearly socially…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Game Theory and Voting Systems
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
