Advancements in Natural Language Processing for Automatic Text Summarization

TL;DR

This paper reviews recent advancements in NLP and Deep Learning that have improved automatic text summarization, analyzing hybrid approaches, their strengths and weaknesses, and evaluating various models through comparative analysis.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive survey of hybrid extractive and abstractive summarization techniques, including their pros, cons, and evaluation methods, highlighting recent progress in the field.

Findings

Hybrid techniques combine extractive and abstractive methods.

Evaluation matrices help compare summary quality.

Progress in NLP enhances summarization effectiveness.

Abstract

The substantial growth of textual content in diverse domains and platforms has led to a considerable need for Automatic Text Summarization (ATS) techniques that aid in the process of text analysis. The effectiveness of text summarization models has been significantly enhanced in a variety of technical domains because of advancements in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Deep Learning (DL). Despite this, the process of summarizing textual information continues to be significantly constrained by the intricate writing styles of a variety of texts, which involve a range of technical complexities. Text summarization techniques can be broadly categorized into two main types: abstractive summarization and extractive summarization. Extractive summarization involves directly extracting sentences, phrases, or segments of text from the content without making any changes. On the other hand, abstractive summarization is achieved by reconstructing the sentences, phrases, or segments from the original text using linguistic analysis. Through this study, a linguistically diverse categorizations of text summarization approaches have been addressed in a constructive manner. In this paper, the authors explored existing hybrid techniques that have employed both extractive and abstractive methodologies. In addition, the pros and cons of various approaches discussed in the literature are also investigated. Furthermore, the authors conducted a comparative analysis on different techniques and matrices to evaluate the generated summaries using language generation models. This survey endeavors to provide a comprehensive overview of ATS by presenting the progression of language processing regarding this task through a breakdown of diverse systems and architectures accompanied by technical and mathematical explanations of their operations.