Characterizing categoricity in the class $Add(M)$
Xiaolei Zhang

TL;DR
This paper characterizes when classes of modules, specifically additive modules over a ring, are categorical in large cardinals, linking categoricity to module freeness and providing applications to pure-projective and semisimple modules.
Contribution
It provides a precise characterization of categoricity in tail cardinals for classes of additive modules, connecting it to module freeness and answering open questions.
Findings
Categoricity in large cardinals is equivalent to all modules being free in the class.
Pure-projective modules are categorical iff certain free modules exist.
Semisimple modules are categorical iff the ring has a unique simple module.
Abstract
We show that the condition of being categorical in a tail of cardinals can be characterized for the class of -modules of the form . More precisely, let be a ring and be an -module which can be generated by elements. Then is -categorical in all if and only if is -categorical in some ; if and only if every -module of cardinal in is -free for all ; if and only if every -module of cardinal in is -free. As an application, we show that the class of pure-projective -modules is categorical in some (all) big cardinal if and only if the module is free for each countably generated pure-projective -module ; the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
