Language-Driven Opinion Dynamics in Agent-Based Simulations with LLMs
Erica Cau, Valentina Pansanella, Dino Pedreschi, Giulio Rossetti

TL;DR
This paper introduces LODAS, a model simulating opinion evolution in social debates using language and social dynamics, revealing how AI agents influence and are influenced by fallacious arguments, with implications for understanding biases in LLMs.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel agent-based simulation framework integrating language and social factors to study opinion dynamics and biases in LLM interactions.
Findings
Consensus emerges in most scenarios.
AI agents often produce fallacious arguments.
Agents are highly influenced by logical fallacies.
Abstract
Understanding how opinions evolve is crucial for addressing issues such as polarization, radicalization, and consensus in social systems. While much research has focused on identifying factors influencing opinion change, the role of language and argumentative fallacies remains underexplored. This paper aims to fill this gap by investigating how language - along with social dynamics - influences opinion evolution through LODAS, a Language-Driven Opinion Dynamics Model for Agent-Based Simulations. The model simulates debates around the "Ship of Theseus" paradox, in which agents with discrete opinions interact with each other and evolve their opinions by accepting, rejecting, or ignoring the arguments presented. We study three different scenarios: balanced, polarized, and unbalanced opinion distributions. Agreeableness and sycophancy emerge as two main characteristics of LLM agents, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Language and cultural evolution · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
