Rejoinder to Reader Reaction "On exact randomization-based covariate-adjusted confidence intervals" by Jacob Fiksel
Ke Zhu, Hanzhong Liu

TL;DR
This paper develops an analytical method to invert Fisher randomization tests for non-monotonic p-value functions, enabling accurate covariate-adjusted confidence intervals in randomized experiments.
Contribution
It introduces a new analytical approach to invert FRTs for non-monotonic p-value functions, including the studentized t-statistic, improving confidence interval accuracy.
Findings
The method guarantees desired coverage probability.
Simulation results show computational efficiency.
Resolves contradictions in previous studies.
Abstract
We applaud Fiksel (2024) for their valuable contributions to randomization-based inference, particularly their work on inverting the Fisher randomization test (FRT) to construct confidence intervals using the covariate-adjusted test statistic. FRT is advocated by many scholars because it produces finite-sample exact p-values for any test statistic and can be easily adopted for any experimental design (Rosenberger et al., 2019; Proschan and Dodd, 2019; Young, 2019; Bind and Rubin, 2020). By inverting FRTs, we can construct the randomization-based confidence interval (RBCI). To the best of our knowledge, Zhu and Liu (2023) are the first to analytically invert the FRT for the difference-in-means statistic. Fiksel (2024) extended this analytical approach to the covariate-adjusted statistic, producing a monotonic p-value function under certain conditions. In this rejoinder, we propose an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
