CHEX-MATE: Scaling relations of radio halo profiles for clusters in the LoTSS DR2 area
M. Balboni, S. Ettori, F. Gastaldello, R. Cassano, A. Bonafede, V., Cuciti, A. Botteon, G. Brunetti, I. Bartalucci, M. Gaspari, R. Gavazzi, S., Ghizzardi, M. Gitti, L. Lovisari, B. J. Maughan, S. Molendi, E., Pointecouteau, G.W. Pratt, E. Rasia, G. Riva, M. Rossetti

TL;DR
This study investigates the relationship between galaxy cluster mass and radio emission profiles at low frequencies, revealing that accounting for mass and redshift reduces scatter and highlighting the role of cluster dynamics and magnetic fields.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of the scaling relations between cluster mass and radio profiles, incorporating spatially resolved data and considering the impact of cluster dynamical status and magnetic fields.
Findings
Reducing scatter by a factor of ~4 when accounting for mass and redshift.
No strong evidence for a direct R_H-M relation, suggesting structure formation influences halo size.
Constraints on magnetic field dependence consistent with theoretical expectations.
Abstract
The thermal and non-thermal components in galaxy clusters have properties that, although shaped from different physical phenomena, can share some similarities, mainly driven by their halo mass and the accretion processes. Scaling relations have been proven to exist for both components and studied in X-ray (thermal) and radio (non-thermal) bands. At the radio wavelength, such investigations are so far limited to the integrated quantities (e.g. total power and mass). We aimed to investigate the scaling relations between the mass of a galaxy cluster and its radio emission at low frequencies, treating both the integrated and the spatially resolved quantities for a sample of well-selected targets. We crossmatched LoTSS DR2 and CHEX-MATE datasets in order to get the deepest and most homogeneous radio data of a representative sample of objects. We analytically derived the expected relation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
