Defining bias in AI-systems: Biased models are fair models
Chiara Lindloff, Ingo Siegert

TL;DR
This paper argues that understanding bias in AI requires a clear definition, distinguishing it from fairness and discrimination, to improve fairness discussions and model evaluation.
Contribution
It challenges the assumption that biased models are unfair, proposing a nuanced conceptualization of bias to advance fairness debates in AI.
Findings
Bias and fairness are distinct concepts in AI systems.
A clear definition of bias can improve fairness assessments.
Reframing bias helps foster more constructive academic discussions.
Abstract
The debate around bias in AI systems is central to discussions on algorithmic fairness. However, the term bias often lacks a clear definition, despite frequently being contrasted with fairness, implying that an unbiased model is inherently fair. In this paper, we challenge this assumption and argue that a precise conceptualization of bias is necessary to effectively address fairness concerns. Rather than viewing bias as inherently negative or unfair, we highlight the importance of distinguishing between bias and discrimination. We further explore how this shift in focus can foster a more constructive discourse within academic debates on fairness in AI systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
MethodsFocus
