Estimating Magnitude Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: A Comparative Study of Catalog-based Methods
Xinyi Wang, Jiawei Li, Ao Feng, Didier Sornette

TL;DR
This study evaluates nine methods for estimating earthquake catalog completeness, introduces a new probabilistic model, and identifies the most effective approach for both uniform and non-uniform Mc distributions, improving seismic data analysis.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation framework for catalog-based Mc estimation methods and introduces BSReLU, a novel probabilistic model for improved completeness estimation.
Findings
MBS-WW method shows best overall performance.
BSReLU offers a probabilistic approach to Mc modeling.
Framework effectively tests methods on diverse datasets.
Abstract
Without rigorous attention to the completeness of earthquake catalogs, claims of new discoveries or forecasting skills cannot be deemed credible. Therefore, estimating the completeness magnitude (Mc) is a critical step. Among various approaches, catalog-based methods are the simplest, most straightforward, and most commonly used. However, current evaluation frameworks for these methods lack a unified simulation strategy for generating catalogs that are independent of specific Mc estimation methods. An effective strategy should also be capable of simulating datasets with non-uniform Mc distributions across both spatial and temporal dimensions. In this study, we assess nine catalog-based methods under a robust evaluation framework specifically tailored for this purpose. These methods are tested on datasets with homogeneous and heterogeneous Mc distributions, as well as on real-world…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
