Comparative Study of Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Techniques for Enhanced Derivative Pricing
Giacomo Case

TL;DR
This paper compares Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods for derivative pricing, showing QMC's superior convergence and accuracy, especially in moderate dimensions, through theoretical analysis and numerical experiments.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of MC and QMC techniques, highlighting the advantages of low-discrepancy sequences in derivative pricing applications.
Findings
QMC achieves faster convergence rates than MC.
QMC significantly reduces root mean square error in option pricing.
Brownian bridge RQMC improves Asian option pricing accuracy.
Abstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods in the context of derivative pricing, emphasizing convergence rates and the curse of dimensionality. After a concise overview of traditional Monte Carlo techniques for evaluating expectations of derivative securities, the paper introduces quasi-Monte Carlo methods, which leverage low-discrepancy sequences to achieve more uniformly distributed sample points without relying on randomness. Theoretical insights highlight that QMC methods can attain superior convergence rates of compared to the standard MC rate of , where . Numerical experiments are conducted on two types of options: geometric basket call options and Asian call options. For the geometric basket options, a five-dimensional setting under the Black-Scholes framework is utilized,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and financial applications
