Gender Bias in Perception of Human Managers Extends to AI Managers
Hao Cui, Taha Yasseri

TL;DR
This study investigates how gender biases influence perceptions of AI managers compared to human managers, revealing that biases extend to AI and affect trust and fairness judgments.
Contribution
It provides experimental evidence that gender bias in leadership perceptions applies to AI managers, highlighting implications for designing fair AI management systems.
Findings
Participants' perceptions changed after award decisions.
Male managers received more positive evaluations regardless of being human or AI.
Female AI managers faced skepticism, especially when not awarding team members.
Abstract
As AI becomes more embedded in workplaces, it is shifting from a tool for efficiency to an active force in organizational decision-making. Whether due to anthropomorphism or intentional design choices, people often assign human-like qualities, including gender, to AI systems. However, how AI managers are perceived in comparison to human managers and how gender influences these perceptions remains uncertain. To investigate this, we conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where teams of three participants worked together under a randomly assigned manager. The manager was either a human or an AI and was presented as male, female, or gender-unspecified. The manager's role was to select the best-performing team member for an additional award. Our findings reveal that while participants initially showed no strong preference based on manager type or gender, their perceptions changed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
