Graph-Guided Scene Reconstruction from Images with 3D Gaussian Splatting
Chong Cheng, Gaochao Song, Yiyang Yao, Qinzheng Zhou, Gangjian Zhang,, Hao Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces GraphGS, a novel graph-guided framework for high-quality 3D scene reconstruction from images, addressing limitations of existing methods by leveraging camera topology and adaptive strategies for improved accuracy and efficiency.
Contribution
The paper presents a new graph-guided 3D reconstruction framework that incorporates camera topology and adaptive sampling to enhance reconstruction quality and speed.
Findings
Achieves state-of-the-art 3D reconstruction quality.
Effectively alleviates overfitting to sparse viewpoints.
Demonstrates high fidelity across multiple datasets.
Abstract
This paper investigates an open research challenge of reconstructing high-quality, large 3D open scenes from images. It is observed existing methods have various limitations, such as requiring precise camera poses for input and dense viewpoints for supervision. To perform effective and efficient 3D scene reconstruction, we propose a novel graph-guided 3D scene reconstruction framework, GraphGS. Specifically, given a set of images captured by RGB cameras on a scene, we first design a spatial prior-based scene structure estimation method. This is then used to create a camera graph that includes information about the camera topology. Further, we propose to apply the graph-guided multi-view consistency constraint and adaptive sampling strategy to the 3D Gaussian Splatting optimization process. This greatly alleviates the issue of Gaussian points overfitting to specific sparse viewpoints and…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
Overall, I like that the authors propose very practical optimizations that bring both quality and run-time improvements. * Originality: The key original contribution of the paper is: Concentric Nearest Neighbor Pairing (CNNP) and Quadrant Filter (QF) organizing/pruning view-pairs in camera-graph. Other contributions are good practical applications of previously known ideas. * Clarity: The paper is written in a clear language, structured well, and shows experimental validation of the proposed
The method proposed in the paper is forming camera-graph using Dust3r to find relative poses between image pairs and pruning pairs using the proposed CNNP and QF steps. The efficiency of structure estimation is estimated w.r.t default COLMAP pipeline (assuming incremental Structure from Motion). This is not a fair comparison and sufficient details are not provided, making it harder to assess the true benefit of the proposed improvements. - Paper mentions that Dust3r is used to estimate pairwis
1. the paper is easy to understand. 2. the results show the effectiveness of proposed pipeline.
1. The manuscript lacks a detailed explanation for each term in Equation (1), which would enhance clarity and understanding. 2. Many of the authors' methods are designed to improve upon COLMAP. It would be beneficial to include experiments comparing the accuracy of initial values in GS, such as pose accuracy, to illustrate the improvements.
The authors present an elaborate pre-processing framework to effectively scale Gaussian splitting to large scenes. The ideas presented in the paper are exciting and well-presented for the most part. The concept of exploiting low-cost prior heuristics to allow the network to focus on the underlying task is interesting and the experimental evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness of the method.
1) minor: There are some spelling errors, please proofread the manuscript e.g ( line 135 formed -> form, line 138 initializaition -> initialization ) 2) Line 147 - 149: Please specify here which models you use to obtain camera poses. How approximate are these poses? What is the error tolerance? Could you please provide quantitative metrics on the initial pose quality compared to ground truth if available? 3) For the concentric nn pairing the authors use the symbol S multiple times. It would m
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsMedical Image Segmentation Techniques · Digital Image Processing Techniques · Cell Image Analysis Techniques
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training
