LED-Merging: Mitigating Safety-Utility Conflicts in Model Merging with Location-Election-Disjoint
Qianli Ma, Dongrui Liu, Qian Chen, Linfeng Zhang, Jing Shao

TL;DR
LED-Merging is a novel, training-free framework that effectively mitigates safety-utility conflicts in model merging by locating, selecting, and isolating task-specific neurons, leading to safer and more reliable multi-task LLMs.
Contribution
It introduces a three-stage neuron-level merging framework that addresses neuron misidentification and interference, improving safety and utility in model merging without additional training.
Findings
Reduces harmful response rates by 31.4% on HarmBench.
Preserves 95% of utility performance, e.g., 52.39% accuracy on GSM8K.
Effective across multiple LLM architectures like Llama-3-8B, Mistral-7B, and Llama2-13B.
Abstract
Fine-tuning pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) for specialized tasks incurs substantial computational and data costs. While model merging offers a training-free solution to integrate multiple task-specific models, existing methods suffer from safety-utility conflicts where enhanced general capabilities degrade safety safeguards. We identify two root causes: due to simplistic parameter magnitude-based selection, and during merging. To address these challenges, we propose , a three-stage framework that ocates task-specific neurons via gradient-based attribution, dynamically lects critical neurons through multi-model importance fusion, and isjoints conflicting updates through parameter isolation. Extensive experiments on Llama-3-8B, Mistral-7B, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
