The MAGPI Survey: the kinematic morphology-density relation (or lack thereof) and the Hubble sequence at $z\sim0.3$
Caroline Foster, Mark W. Donoghoe, Andrew Battisti, Francesco, D'Eugenio, Katherine Harborne, Thomas Venville, Claudia Del P. Lagos, J., Trevor Mendel, Ryan Bagge, Stefania Barsanti, Sabine Bellstedt, Alina, Boecker, Qianhui Chen, Caro Derkenne, Anna Ferre-Matteu, Eda Gjergo

TL;DR
This study analyzes the morphological and kinematic properties of 637 galaxies at z~0.3, finding that the kinematic morphology-density relation observed locally is not yet established at this redshift, suggesting pre-processing occurs earlier.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian classification method with confidence estimates and provides the first detailed kinematic-morphological analysis at intermediate redshift.
Findings
Full range of morphological types is present at z~0.3.
Rotating and non-rotating galaxies are already in place at this epoch.
No evidence of the local kinematic morphology-density relation at z~0.3.
Abstract
This work presents visual morphological and dynamical classifications for 637 spatially resolved galaxies, most of which are at intermediate redshift (), in the Middle-Ages Galaxy Properties with Integral field spectroscopy (MAGPI) Survey. For each galaxy, we obtain a minimum of 11 independent visual classifications by knowledgeable classifiers. We use an extension of the standard Dawid-Skene bayesian model introducing classifier-specific confidence parameters and galaxy-specific difficulty parameters to quantify classifier confidence and infer reliable statistical confidence estimates. Selecting sub-samples of 86 bright ( mag) high-confidence () morphological classifications at redshifts (), we confirm the full range of morphological types is represented in MAGPI as intended in the survey design. Similarly, with a sub-sample of 82 bright…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
