Instruction-Tuning LLMs for Event Extraction with Annotation Guidelines
Saurabh Srivastava, Sweta Pati, Ziyu Yao

TL;DR
This paper investigates how annotation guidelines influence instruction-tuning of large language models for event extraction, showing their benefits in data-rich and low-data scenarios, especially for generalization and rare event types.
Contribution
It introduces the use of annotation guidelines in instruction-tuning for event extraction and evaluates their impact across different data settings and sources.
Findings
Guidelines improve performance with sufficient data.
Guidelines enhance cross-schema generalization.
Guidelines help detect low-frequency event types.
Abstract
In this work, we study the effect of annotation guidelines -- textual descriptions of event types and arguments, when instruction-tuning large language models for event extraction. We conducted a series of experiments with both human-provided and machine-generated guidelines in both full- and low-data settings. Our results demonstrate the promise of annotation guidelines when there is a decent amount of training data and highlight its effectiveness in improving cross-schema generalization and low-frequency event-type performance.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Advanced Computational Techniques and Applications
