Time Warp: The Gap Between Developers' Ideal vs Actual Workweeks in an AI-Driven Era
Sukrit Kumar, Drishti Goel, Thomas Zimmermann, Brian Houck, B. Ashok,, Chetan Bansal

TL;DR
This study analyzes the gap between developers' ideal and actual workweeks, revealing how deviations impact productivity and satisfaction, and identifies tasks suitable for AI automation to improve developer well-being.
Contribution
It quantifies the effects of workweek deviations on productivity and satisfaction, and offers data-driven insights for AI automation in software engineering.
Findings
Significant deviations between ideal and actual workweeks affect satisfaction and productivity.
Certain tasks have a disproportionate impact on developer satisfaction.
Data-driven recommendations for AI automation to align with developers' workflows.
Abstract
Software developers balance a variety of different tasks in a workweek, yet the allocation of time often differs from what they consider ideal. Identifying and addressing these deviations is crucial for organizations aiming to enhance the productivity and well-being of the developers. In this paper, we present the findings from a survey of 484 software developers at Microsoft, which aims to identify the key differences between how developers would like to allocate their time during an ideal workweek versus their actual workweek. Our analysis reveals significant deviations between a developer's ideal workweek and their actual workweek, with a clear correlation: as the gap between these two workweeks widens, we observe a decline in both productivity and satisfaction. By examining these deviations in specific activities, we assess their direct impact on the developers' satisfaction and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
