Estimating Neural Representation Alignment from Sparsely Sampled Inputs and Features
Chanwoo Chun, Abdulkadir Canatar, SueYeon Chung, Daniel D. Lee

TL;DR
This paper introduces a bias-corrected estimator for neural representation similarity that accounts for both input and feature sampling, enabling more accurate comparisons in neural and artificial systems even with sparse data.
Contribution
The authors develop a novel estimator for CKA that corrects for sampling biases in both stimuli and neurons, improving the reliability of neural representation comparisons.
Findings
The new estimator reduces bias in neural similarity measurements.
It enables reliable comparisons with very sparse neuron sampling.
Application reveals progressive disentanglement of object representations.
Abstract
In both artificial and biological systems, the centered kernel alignment (CKA) has become a widely used tool for quantifying neural representation similarity. While current CKA estimators typically correct for the effects of finite stimuli sampling, the effects of sampling a subset of neurons are overlooked, introducing notable bias in standard experimental scenarios. Here, we provide a theoretical analysis showing how this bias is affected by the representation geometry. We then introduce a novel estimator that corrects for both input and feature sampling. We use our method for evaluating both brain-to-brain and model-to-brain alignments and show that it delivers reliable comparisons even with very sparsely sampled neurons. We perform within-animal and across-animal comparisons on electrophysiological data from visual cortical areas V1, V4, and IT data, and use these as benchmarks to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications
